Diversification Dilemma


Diversification has given way to focus in developed countries like the United States and the United Kingdom,  and has often been correlated with lower performance. In contrast, diversified business groups have been hugely successful in most emerging markets, particularly in Asia.

Since the mid 1980s, strategists in countries like the United States and the United Kingdom have mostly advocated the use of focused strategies for businesses and have advised companies to ‘stick to their knitting’. Many diversified conglomerates in these advanced economies have been dismantled since 1980s to focus on one or a few core businesses.

A look at the motives with which companies diversify reveals some of the reasons why diversification by conglomerates yields benefits in the developing markets as against the discount associated with diversified conglomerates in the developed economies.

Growth is a primary motive for diversification

However growth does not always translate into higher profitability. Since management status and power is correlated more closely with the size of assets under management, management (the ‘agent’) may have the incentive to diversify for pursuing growth in preference to profitability, which is not in the best interest of shareholders.

Reducing risk

Having different businesses in their portfolio can potentially balance differences in the industry cycles and thus it increases the stability of a company. But the value of diversification advantage to the company may be offset by the high transaction cost associated with acquisition. Moreover shareholders can themselves reduce the risk of their portfolio by holding diversified portfolios. This is another argument against diversification in the developed economies.

Diversify or not

Corporate parenting advantage

Effective corporate management is given as the reason for existence and success of diversified conglomerates in the developing markets. The differences in the institutional context—i.e. a country’s capital markets, labour markets, consumer awareness, regulatory and legal system  that influences business practices and ethics,  infrastructure etc favours the presence of diversified conglomerates in developing countries.

Profitability

Corporate advantage due to diversification exists if the portfolio performance is greater than sum of performances of individual businesses. In the developing economies, diversified conglomerates wield considerable economic and political clout. Being a part of a diversified group increases the overall stability of the company’s cash flow.

Thus, diversification is context specific. “Stick to your knitting” may not be the best recommendation for firms in high-growth markets or regions that have strong corporate advantages.

  • author's avatar

    By: Life11BlogAdmin

    No biography available at this time

  • author's avatar

Steer towards a positive, smart and balanced lifestyle

Signup now to receive ideas for smart living in your mailbox

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

2 thoughts on “Diversification Dilemma

  • May 27, 2015 at 11:54 pm
    Permalink

    Management time for various business lines gets scarcer which leads to core businesses getting neglected since most South Asian companies have one or one set of decision makers at the apex. The diversified group have to come off from their though process of centralised decision making to being led by an empowered set of professionals fully responsible for each SBU.

    Reply
    • May 28, 2015 at 12:00 am
      Permalink

      It is very specific to regional conditions. In emerging countries where markets are not as matured, corporate parenting advantages for raising finance are often greater than in the developed markets.

      Reply

Say what you want to!

%d bloggers like this: